Ween the reference and test groups. Traits Sex, n ( ) Male Female
Ween the reference and test groups. Characteristics Sex, n ( ) Male Female Age (years), imply SD Age category, n ( ) 184 years 254 years 454 years 65 years BMI (kg/m2 ), imply SD BMI category, n ( ) Underweight, 18.four Normal weight, 18.54.9 Overweight, 259.9 Obese, 30 Added sugars Elbasvir Epigenetic Reader Domain intake (g), imply SD 13 C (), imply SD Reference Group (n = 256) n ( ) Unless 20-HETE Protocol Otherwise Noted 60 (23) 197 (77) 42.4 14.7 Test Group (n = 56) n ( ) Unless Otherwise Noted 34 (61) 22 (39) 53.1 16.0 Test Statistic and p-Value 2 = 30.six p 0.001 F = 23.7 p 0.001 two = 28.5 p 0.33 (13) 117 (46) 91 (35) 16 (six) 31.8 9.7 (12.five) 7 (12.5) 30 (53.five) 12 (21.5) 29.5 4.F = three.4 p = 0.07 2 = ten.0 p = 0.3 (1) 65 (25.5) 65 (25.5) 124 (48) 88.8 58.0 (0) six (11) 24 (43) 26 (46) 68.eight 43.F = 5.8 p = 0.02 F = ten.3 p = 0.001 F = 526.9 p 0.-19.1 0.7.four 0.a-19.5 0.9.1 0.Nutrients 2021, 13, x meanPEER Overview 15 N (), FOR SD aSample size for 15 N for reference group = 115.Figure 1. Reported added sugars intake compared to predicted added sugarssugarsfor the 13 C single-carbon and 13 C and 13C Figure 1. Reported added sugars intake in comparison to predicted added intake intake for the 13C single-carbon and and 15 N dual-carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratio prediction models in the testthe test group Important difference difference 15N dual-carbon and nitrogen steady isotope ratio prediction models in group (n = 56). (n = 56). Substantial among reported added sugars intake and dual-isotope model at p p = 0.02. 13 and 15 N dual-isotope model (imply among reported added sugars intake and dual-isotope model at = 0.02. 13 C C and 15N dual-isotope model (imply differencedifference standard error = 13.0 g; 5.4= -2.95; two.95; 0.003). NoNo significantdifference was identified amongst reported regular error = 13.0 five.4 Z g; Z = – p = p = 0.003). considerable difference was discovered involving reported added added sugars intake and predicted added intake for the the 13 C single-isotope model (imply distinction regular sugars intake and predicted added sugars sugars intake for 13C single-isotope model (mean difference regular error = -3.6 5.5error = -3.six 5.five g; Z = -0.55, p = 0.59). g; Z = -0.55, p = 0.59).Figure 1. Reported added sugars intake compared to predicted added sugars intake for the 13C single-carbon and 13C and 15N dual-carbon and nitrogen steady isotope ratio prediction models in the test group (n = 56). Substantial difference between reported added sugars intake and dual-isotope model at p = 0.02. 13C and 15N dual-isotope model (imply differNutrientsence 3, 3842 error = 13.0 five.four g; Z = -2.95; p = 0.003). No substantial difference was identified among reported added 2021, regular sugars intake and predicted added sugars intake for the 13C single-isotope model (mean distinction regular error = -3.6 5.five g; Z = -0.55, p = 0.59).6 ofFigure two. Bland ltman analysis of reported and predicted added sugars intake a utilizing a C singleFigure two. Bland ltman analysis of reported and predicted added sugars intake (g) using (g) 13C single-carbon stable isotope ratiopredictionmodel in within the test group 56). 56). center line rep- represents the carbon stable isotope ratio prediction model the test group (n = (n = The The center line resents the mean difference, as well as the upper and reduced lines indicate the imply 1.96 regular deviation. imply distinction, plus the upper and lower lines indicate the mean 1.96 normal deviation.Nutrients 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW3.three. Dual-Isotope Equation3.three. Dual-Isotope Equation7 of 11 Wh.