Ariable and MSDS synchrony of VTstimulation (synchronousasynchronous) and skin color in the rubber hand (blackwhite) as independent variables.It was found that there were no substantial effects of either synchrony of stimulation, F p or of skin colour, F p and nor was there a significant interaction in between synchrony and skin colour, F p indicating that participants across the four groups had comparable scores within the prestimulation SCIAT (Table).We next investigated no matter if preexisting implicit attitudes could predict the extent to which participants skilled ownership for the black rubber hand.To perform this, participants’ scores inside the four introspective questions had been averaged with each other to create an embodiment index, this scale was identified to possess a high internal consistency (Chronbach’s ).Data from participants exposed to the black rubber hand (n for synchronous stimulation, and n for asynchronous stimulation) was then entered in a twostep hierarchical linear regression with all the embodiment index because the dependant variable.Prestimulation SCIAT score and synchrony of VTstimulation (synchronous or asynchronous) were entered as possible predictor variables at the 1st step, and the interaction among them was entered as a possible predictor variable at the second step.The general model fit was considerable in the initially step, r adjusted F p .Synchrony of VTstimulation wasIn order to assess the impact of synchronous multisensory stimulation on implicit attitudes to black people today, an evaluation of covariance was carried out with participant’s score around the poststimulation SCIAT as the dependent variable and two among subjects aspects; form of VTstimulation (synchronousasynchronous) and skin colour of the rubber hand (blackwhite; PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21542743 Table).Participant’s prestimulation SCIAT scores had been included as a covariate so as to control for participant’s preexisting attitudes toward black persons (as per Huck and Mclean, Tabachnick and Fidell,).The evaluation of covariance (ANCOVA) found no substantial main effects of either variety of VT stimulation or skin colour.On the other hand, importantly, a considerable interaction amongst the two aspects was discovered, F p MSE .(see Figure).FIGURE Poststimulation IAT scores with prestimulation IAT scores covaried out.Greater values indicate more optimistic attitudes toward black individuals.Error bars indicate SEM.Table Implies and common deviations for SCIAT and embodiment index in each and every situation.PreVT SCIAT Embodiment after very first session of VT M Synch black Synch white Asynch black Asynch white ….SD ….M ….SD ….Embodiment following second session of VT M ….SD ….M ….SD ….PostVT SCIATwww.frontiersin.orgJanuary Volume Short article Farmer et al.Adjust my physique, transform my mindAn interaction was also located among pre VTstimulation SCIAT score and synchrony, [F p MSE .], and involving pre VTstimulation SCIAT score, skin color and synchrony, [F p MSE .].These interactions amongst the independent variables along with the covariate indicated that the homogeneity of regression slopes assumption for ANCOVA had been violated.As a result, to be able to make sure that the results discovered inside the ANCOVA were reputable, the JohnsonNeyman method advised by Tabachnick and Fidell was made use of to discover the regions of significance for the observed effects.It was identified that for all those participants using a preVT stimulation SCIAT score of above indicating extra good attitudes toward black persons, there was no significant interaction b.