Threat elements for a likely diagnosis of CMD, n ; probable CMD
Threat elements for a most likely diagnosis of CMD, n ; probable CMD, n Risk variables N CMD prevalence CI .Crude odds ratio ( CI) Gender and age adjusted odds ratio ( CI) Totally adjusted odds ratioa ( CI) n , p valueaTotal sample Demographics Age Gender Male Female Region of residence Rural Urban Socioeconomic status,, , , , , TCV-309 (chloride) site Referent . . Referent . Referent .Referent . . Referent . Referent .Referent . . Referent . Referent ..b ….Variety of household assets owned (Asset index) At the moment studying Yes No (including in no way went to College) Social relationships Marital status No Yes Yes each of the time Yes in some cases No No Yes No Yes , , , , , , , , Referent . Referent . . Referent . Referent . Referent . Referent . . Referent . Referent . Referent . Referent . . Referent . Referent . …. , Referent . Referent . Referent . , , Referent . . Referent . . Referent . . .b ..Autonomy (generating own choices)Being able to talk about challenges connected to sex to peers, parents or teachersBeing in a position to talk about personal difficulties to peers, parents or teachersSexual harassment, physical and sexual abuse Sexual harassment (ever been PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21300754 talked to about sex uncomfortably) No Yes No Yes , , Referent . Referent . Referent . Referent . Referent . Referent . \.\.Getting been beaten within the last months Table continued Threat factors N CMD prevalence Crude odds ratio ( CI)Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Gender and age adjusted odds ratio ( CI)Completely adjusted odds ratioa ( CI) n ,p valueaHaving ever been sexually abused No Yesa b, Referent .Referent .Referent .\.Completely adjusted model (incorporates sociodemographics elements, social relationships and physical abuse elements) p for trendparticipants and it really is feasible that our sample might not be representative of youth with larger education or qualifications.Having said that, it truly is accepted that Goa is not representative from the whole population of IndiaTable (as, indeed, no other single Indian state may be regarded representative with the rest of the country) and hence, our findings might not be representative in the complete Indian population.Within this sample the prevalence of CMD was .that is significantly less than the prevalence reported in other studies on youth studies outside of India however it does fall within prevalence rates among young and adult samples reported in India .National reports and systematic evaluations made in India usually show a varied prevalence of mental problems across India inside the adultpopulations and also a low prevalence in comparison with research globally .Urban area of residence was independently related using a greater threat of creating a CMD in this sample (Table); this association disappeared immediately after gender stratification possibly resulting from loss of statistical power (Table).That is the second time that urbanicity was located to be a threat aspect within the very same setting but a diverse age group.Pillai et al. reported an improved association of urban living and CMD in an adolescent age group in Goa with an odds ratio of .(p ) compared with adolescents living in rural areas.Elevated prevalence and substantial association of CMD with urban areas are well known in India though causes stay to become established.Reddy and Chandrashekar reported, from their metaanalyticalTable Final multivariate model presenting all variables significantly related with CMD in full adjusted model stratified by gender Threat factorsa Male (n ,) p worth Female (n ,) p valueBeing in a position to speak about individual troubles to peers, parents or te.