S function and education. In neither study is data pertinent to
S function and coaching. In neither study is data pertinent to group leaderstherapists presented. Drastically, and in the light of the goal of the present study that is to present descriptive data pertaining to group leaders’ perceptions of their work with grandparent caregivers, in none with the above operate with such persons are group leadertherapist perceptions discussed. Ultimately, such perceptions could bear around the impactefficacy of a given intervention targeting grandparents raising grandchildren, becoming it schoolbased, psychotherapeutic, support grouprelated, or communitybased.Theoretical Approaches to Smaller Group LeadershipA variety of diverse theoretical approaches exist for understanding the potential positive or adverse effect of group order Fruquintinib leaders on the participants in the groups they’ve led (see critiques by Dihn et al 204; Haslam, Reicher, Platow, 205). Numerous of those theories are relevant towards the queries we were interested in asking as well as the information we collected. A single class of theories focuses upon leader characteristics. One example is, perception of selfefficacy (see Bandura, 977) could be essential to leaders’ effectiveness (Kane et al 2002). Alternatively, incivility spiral theory (Pearson, Andersson Porath, 2005) suggests that a leader’s incivility influences the appearance of comparable behaviors amongst group members, undermining group cohesion and communication. Likewise, one’s Leadership Style (termed authoritarianhierarchicalinstrumental versus responsibleparticipative) (see Storsletten Jakobsen, 205) reflects the nature of one’s views about group participants (as either extra or significantly less potent, in require of versus not requiring control, or in some manner inferior to the leader versus seeing such persons as equals) and has been employed extensively to understand group leadership. For the extent that one style is superior towards the other depends on the predicament in which leadership is exercised (Vecchio, Bullis, Brazil, 2006).Grandfamilies. Author manuscript; accessible in PMC 206 September 29.Hayslip et al.PageAlternatively, other theories emphasize interactions in between group leaders and group participants, wherein leaders in varying degrees reinforce group members, use verbal and nonverbal communication methods, or interact with group members dependent upon the latter’s personal attributes (Dies, 977). A single may also use Functional Leadership Theory (Kane, 996; Kane et al 2002) to understand group leaders’ perceptions of their roles (e.g. boundaries, responsibilities) and also the adequacy of their ability to meet such roles. Functional Leadership Theory may possibly also be employed to understand leaders’ views concerning the roles they anticipate group participants to play, such as their perceptions of what group participants expect of them as leaders. Group Focal Conflict Theory (see Champe Rubel, 202) stresses the leader’s ability to lower a selection PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23701633 of prospective focal intragroup conflicts via the creation of an enabling group environment stressing the improvement of productive solutions to resolve group members’ conflict.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptGroup Leaders’ Influence and Effect on Group MembersIn light of the diversity of theoretical approaches to studying group leadership, it truly is not surprising that they have generated an excellent deal of research speaking towards the possible influence leaders can have on group members. Within this light, it’s certainly the case that leader effects have already been observed.