Ive sense) and GAPDH 39primer usingMonoclonal Antibodies Inhibiting HCV 
InfectionFigure 3. Effect of mAbs on HCV infection. (A) JFH1 virus was preincubated with increasing concentrations (0.5, 5, 50, 100 mg/ml) of mAbs (E8G9 and H1H10) or 100 mg/ml of non-specific antibody F1G4 (Non sp) for 1 hr at 37uC before infecting Huh7.5 cells. Three days post infection, total cellular RNA was isolated and HCV negative strand level was measured using real time RT-PCR. GAPDH was used as an internal control. (B) mAb E8G9 was used in increasing concentrations to inhibit the virus entry and the input viral RNA present inside the cells (positive strand) was estimated 3 h post 12926553 infection by real time RT-PCR. GAPDH was used as an internal control. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053619.gInhibition of HCV-LP Binding to Huh 7 Cells by mAbsSince all the mAbs exhibited cross-genotype Solvent Yellow 14 chemical information specificity in reactivity, it is likely that these mAbs would inhibit binding of HCV-LPs to Huh7 cells. To explore this possibility, increasing concentrations of mAbs were incubated with constant amount HCV-LPs and the binding of HCV-LPs to Huh 7 cells was monitored. The inhibition of HCV-LPs binding by mAbs was determined by flow cytometric analysis. Results showed dose dependent inhibition of binding of the HCV-LP with increasing concentrations of the mAb E8G9 (,66 ). Considerable inhibition was also observed with mAb H1H10 (,30 ). However all other mAbs did not show appreciable inhibition of the binding (Fig. 2). The results are tabulated in Table 2 and Table 3. A non-specific antibody F1G4 has been used as a negative control [32] (Figure S3).Inhibition of Virus Entry by the mAbs in HCV Cell CultureFlow cytometric analysis suggested that mAbs E8G9 and H1H10 were able to inhibit the HCV LPs binding to Huh7 cells. To verify whether this property is also shown when virions of hepatitis C are used, neutralization assays were performed using JFH1 virus. The virus was pre-incubated with different concentrations of the antibodies (EG89 H1H10) specific for HCV-LP (genotype 3a) for 1hr 
at 37uC before infection. An Docosahexaenoyl ethanolamide chemical information unrelated monoclonal antibody (F1G4) was used as negative control. Three days post infection, the effect of antibodies on HCV negative strand synthesis was measured by real time RT-PCR. Huh7.5 cells infected with JFH1 virus in the presence of 100 mg/ml E8G9 mAb showed nearly 65 reduction in intracellular HCV RNA level, while H1H10 showed a modest decrease of about 20 at the same concentration and non specific antibody did not show any inhibition (Fig. 3A). To further confirm that this inhibition of HCV negative strand synthesis by E8G9 antibody is due to inhibition of virus entry, weMonoclonal Antibodies Inhibiting HCV InfectionFigure 4. Epitope mapping of E8G9. (A) 15755315 Schematic representation of different fragments of HCV E2 protein used for epitope mapping. (B) Western blot analysis of the recombinant proteins from five regions of E2 (region 3 specific for E8G9 is indicated using an arrow). (R1 5 denote different regions). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053619.gperformed in vitro neutralization assay and quantified the level of input positive strand three hours post infection using real time RTPCR (Fig. 3B). A significant reduction in virus entry at 50 and 100 mg/ml was observed with E8G9 mAb suggesting it as a good candidate for inhibiting HCV entry in cell culture system.Epitope Mapping of mAbsThe inhibition of binding of HCV-LPs to Huh 7 cells by E8G9 and not by D2H3 may be due to.Ive sense) and GAPDH 39primer usingMonoclonal Antibodies Inhibiting HCV InfectionFigure 3. Effect of mAbs on HCV infection. (A) JFH1 virus was preincubated with increasing concentrations (0.5, 5, 50, 100 mg/ml) of mAbs (E8G9 and H1H10) or 100 mg/ml of non-specific antibody F1G4 (Non sp) for 1 hr at 37uC before infecting Huh7.5 cells. Three days post infection, total cellular RNA was isolated and HCV negative strand level was measured using real time RT-PCR. GAPDH was used as an internal control. (B) mAb E8G9 was used in increasing concentrations to inhibit the virus entry and the input viral RNA present inside the cells (positive strand) was estimated 3 h post 12926553 infection by real time RT-PCR. GAPDH was used as an internal control. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053619.gInhibition of HCV-LP Binding to Huh 7 Cells by mAbsSince all the mAbs exhibited cross-genotype specificity in reactivity, it is likely that these mAbs would inhibit binding of HCV-LPs to Huh7 cells. To explore this possibility, increasing concentrations of mAbs were incubated with constant amount HCV-LPs and the binding of HCV-LPs to Huh 7 cells was monitored. The inhibition of HCV-LPs binding by mAbs was determined by flow cytometric analysis. Results showed dose dependent inhibition of binding of the HCV-LP with increasing concentrations of the mAb E8G9 (,66 ). Considerable inhibition was also observed with mAb H1H10 (,30 ). However all other mAbs did not show appreciable inhibition of the binding (Fig. 2). The results are tabulated in Table 2 and Table 3. A non-specific antibody F1G4 has been used as a negative control [32] (Figure S3).Inhibition of Virus Entry by the mAbs in HCV Cell CultureFlow cytometric analysis suggested that mAbs E8G9 and H1H10 were able to inhibit the HCV LPs binding to Huh7 cells. To verify whether this property is also shown when virions of hepatitis C are used, neutralization assays were performed using JFH1 virus. The virus was pre-incubated with different concentrations of the antibodies (EG89 H1H10) specific for HCV-LP (genotype 3a) for 1hr at 37uC before infection. An unrelated monoclonal antibody (F1G4) was used as negative control. Three days post infection, the effect of antibodies on HCV negative strand synthesis was measured by real time RT-PCR. Huh7.5 cells infected with JFH1 virus in the presence of 100 mg/ml E8G9 mAb showed nearly 65 reduction in intracellular HCV RNA level, while H1H10 showed a modest decrease of about 20 at the same concentration and non specific antibody did not show any inhibition (Fig. 3A). To further confirm that this inhibition of HCV negative strand synthesis by E8G9 antibody is due to inhibition of virus entry, weMonoclonal Antibodies Inhibiting HCV InfectionFigure 4. Epitope mapping of E8G9. (A) 15755315 Schematic representation of different fragments of HCV E2 protein used for epitope mapping. (B) Western blot analysis of the recombinant proteins from five regions of E2 (region 3 specific for E8G9 is indicated using an arrow). (R1 5 denote different regions). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053619.gperformed in vitro neutralization assay and quantified the level of input positive strand three hours post infection using real time RTPCR (Fig. 3B). A significant reduction in virus entry at 50 and 100 mg/ml was observed with E8G9 mAb suggesting it as a good candidate for inhibiting HCV entry in cell culture system.Epitope Mapping of mAbsThe inhibition of binding of HCV-LPs to Huh 7 cells by E8G9 and not by D2H3 may be due to.