Lter. Additionally, particulate C2 Ceramide Autophagy matter content in the flue gas was also measured, for comparison the gas at the gas obtained from combustion of Table 1. Final results of the Flavonol manufacturer measurements with the particulate matter content inwith the flueinlet and at the outlet of filter. non-filtered process gas.Description Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Average Notes Inlet–mi , mg/m3 2320 1990 2257 (N) Outcomes of the2460 three. Measurements and Their Analysis (N) Volumetric flow rate of your gas:370 inside the 22.4 19.53 The outcomes 17.four measurements from the particulate matter content material m3 /h process gas of your 18.eight Temperature in the gas: 380 C upstream and 99.3 Efficiency of particulate matter removal, , downstream from the filter are summarized in Table 1, the results in the meas99.2 98.9 99.1 urements of particulate matter collected in the filter are given in Table two, when the outcomes of your measurements of the procedure gas composition are presented in Table three and in Table two. Benefits of the analysis of particulate matter collected in the tested filter. a graphic kind in Figure 5. The outcomes of after the Ash Volatile Content material the particulate matter d Qs d Ccontent inside the procedure gas d Hd N prior to and Sd Sample filtration happen to be collected in Table 1. Table 2 presents the evaluation of particulate matter MJ/kg collected from the ceramic filter, while Table 3 presents the outcomes of the particulate matter 18.26 48.65 30.40 74.36 1.04 0.23 0.01 content within the flue gas with and without having filtering on the procedure gas. The composition of your process gas is presented in Table four (typical values) along with in Figure 5, which presents gas composition in time. Table three. Outcomes in the measurements of particulate matter content material in flue gas in the installation outlet. Outlet–mo , mg/m3 Sample Sample Table 1. Outcomes on the measurements from the particulate matterSample in the gas in the inlet and in the outlet of filter. content material Typical Comments 1 2 3 Particulate matter in flue gas, mg/m3 Inlet–mi, mg/m3 (N) Particulate matter in flue gas, mg/m3 Outlet–mo, mg/m3 (N)Efficiency of particulate matter removal, , Description Test 1 (N) 2460 (N) 17.4 99.164Test 2 2320 142 18.eight 130 99.Test 3 1990144 22.4121 98.Typical 150 2257 120 19.53 99.Without having approach gas filtering Filtering of flow price of thegas stream /h Volumetric 20 process gas: 370 mTemperature on the gas: 380Notesmg/m3 (N)Filtering of 20 process gas streamTable four. Benefits of the analysis on the process gas composition.Energies 2021, 14, 7476 SampleProcess gasCO 17.CO2 14.CH4 six.CnHm 0.H2 five.N2 55.O27 of 11 1.Figure 5. Outcomes of your measurements of your method gas composition. Figure five. Results from the measurements of the approach gas composition.As shown in Tableparticulate matter content material inside the approach gas beforein theafter the The outcomes from the 1, the average measured particulate matter content material and process gas upstream of thecollected filter is 2257 mg/mpresents thedownstream in the filter is as filtration happen to be ceramic in Table 1. Table two three(N), though evaluation of particulate matter collected from the 3(N). The particulate matter removal efficiency was calculated based low as 19.53 mg/mceramic filter, while Table three presents the outcomes of the particulate matter content material inside the flue gas on the Formula (1): with and without the need of filtering on the course of action gas. The composition in the procedure gas is presented in Table four (average values) in addition to in Figure five, which presents ( – 0) gas composition in time. (1) = 100Table 4. Resu.