Ovide important inforincorporation) followed a normal distribution (Figure 4C, No mation about the potential molecular mechanisms behind the UV). However, in response to UV, a distinct population of lowly involvement of a given gene/protein. There are numerous examtranscribing cells was clearly detectable, even after 18?0 hr ples of this in the data, but here we focus on the phosphopro(Figure 4C, Control). siRNAs giving rise to low transcription mark- teome to illustrate the point. edly increased the percentage of such cells (Figure 4C, Low). It was immediately apparent that some kinases that had not Other siRNAs resulted in a significant shift of the profile toward previously been connected to the PXD101MedChemExpress PX105684 transcription-related DNA the right, suggesting high levels of transcription in these cells damage response must play an important role, such as the pos(Figure 4C, High). The results from the genome-wide screen itive transcription elongation factor b (pTEFb) complex (containare summarized in Figure 4D (see also Table S7). siRNAs target- ing CDK9 kinase). First, we found that CDK9 itself interacts much ing NER- or TC-NER-related gene products such as ERCC1, more with both RNAPII and CSB upon DNA damage, strongly XAB2, HIRA, ERCC5 (XPG), TTDA, and ERCC4 (XPF) resulted suggesting a damage-induced role in transcription or repair. in low transcription, and the known NER factors were generally Moreover, 21 known CDK9 partners and interactors featured aUV, 18 hrsControl siRNA1602 Cell Reports 15, 1597?610, May 17,-ACLSPNATRIPSKIV2L FKBP5 b HSP90AAHTATSF1 PLEC b HNRNPABCL10 b SUPT5H BRCA1 MED1 BRD4 MED28 CCNTTRAP1 MATR3 SMADMYBLRUVBLCDKMEPCE b TRIM28 LARPb TRIP12 RUVBL1 OXSR1 SETD1BMED26 AFF4 TAF7 b SNW1 TRIM33 CASK UBR5 UBE2A CCT3 TAL1 MDFIC PAXIPBMAPK14 SRSF12 USP39 THRAP3 b HNRNPM SRRM2 EIF4A3 CHEK2 ACIN1 b ALYREF NKAP PPIG FLOT1 PNN STAU1 C18ORF25 HMGN3 BCLAFb HSP90AAPAXIPSRPKNELFEFigure 5. Enriching the Phosphoproteome with Results from the Other Screens(A) Proteins that interact with CDK9 (pTEFb) and that become phosphorylated upon UV irradiation. Proteins are labeled increasingly blue with increasing phosphorylation. Proteins that scored in the RNAi screen, (squares with red border), interacted with RNAPII (small green spheres under name), interacted with CSB (red spheres), or became ubiquitylated upon UV irradiation (yellow “dUb”) are indicated. Examples of CSB or RNAPII interactions that increased (black circle around spheres) or decreased (yellow circle around spheres) upon UV irradiation are also specified. (B) As in (A), but for proteins that interact with SRPK1.pTEFb in a protein phosphatase (PP2B/PPP3CA and PP1a/ PPP1CA)-dependent manner (Chen et al., 2008). Interestingly, PPP1CA scored in the siRNA screen, and both PPP1CA and its regulatory subunit PPP1R10 interacted with RNAPII and CSB. Indeed, PPP1R10 was markedly recruited to CSB upon UV irradiation, like CDK9. PPP1R10 contains a domain, TFIIS-N, which is also found in transcription proteins such as MED26, Elongin A, IWS1, and TFIIS, raising the intriguing possibility that this domain is important for PPP1R10’s proposed role in transcription and in the transcription-related DNA damage response in particular. Together, these results place PTEFb (CDK9 and its cyclin partners) at the core of the transcriptionrelated DNA damage response. Several well-known DNA-damage kinases were associated with a large number of increasingly phosphorylated proteins. For example, ATM TSA chemical information kinase has.Ovide important inforincorporation) followed a normal distribution (Figure 4C, No mation about the potential molecular mechanisms behind the UV). However, in response to UV, a distinct population of lowly involvement of a given gene/protein. There are numerous examtranscribing cells was clearly detectable, even after 18?0 hr ples of this in the data, but here we focus on the phosphopro(Figure 4C, Control). siRNAs giving rise to low transcription mark- teome to illustrate the point. edly increased the percentage of such cells (Figure 4C, Low). It was immediately apparent that some kinases that had not Other siRNAs resulted in a significant shift of the profile toward previously been connected to the transcription-related DNA the right, suggesting high levels of transcription in these cells damage response must play an important role, such as the pos(Figure 4C, High). The results from the genome-wide screen itive transcription elongation factor b (pTEFb) complex (containare summarized in Figure 4D (see also Table S7). siRNAs target- ing CDK9 kinase). First, we found that CDK9 itself interacts much ing NER- or TC-NER-related gene products such as ERCC1, more with both RNAPII and CSB upon DNA damage, strongly XAB2, HIRA, ERCC5 (XPG), TTDA, and ERCC4 (XPF) resulted suggesting a damage-induced role in transcription or repair. in low transcription, and the known NER factors were generally Moreover, 21 known CDK9 partners and interactors featured aUV, 18 hrsControl siRNA1602 Cell Reports 15, 1597?610, May 17,-ACLSPNATRIPSKIV2L FKBP5 b HSP90AAHTATSF1 PLEC b HNRNPABCL10 b SUPT5H BRCA1 MED1 BRD4 MED28 CCNTTRAP1 MATR3 SMADMYBLRUVBLCDKMEPCE b TRIM28 LARPb TRIP12 RUVBL1 OXSR1 SETD1BMED26 AFF4 TAF7 b SNW1 TRIM33 CASK UBR5 UBE2A CCT3 TAL1 MDFIC PAXIPBMAPK14 SRSF12 USP39 THRAP3 b HNRNPM SRRM2 EIF4A3 CHEK2 ACIN1 b ALYREF NKAP PPIG FLOT1 PNN STAU1 C18ORF25 HMGN3 BCLAFb HSP90AAPAXIPSRPKNELFEFigure 5. Enriching the Phosphoproteome with Results from the Other Screens(A) Proteins that interact with CDK9 (pTEFb) and that become phosphorylated upon UV irradiation. Proteins are labeled increasingly blue with increasing phosphorylation. Proteins that scored in the RNAi screen, (squares with red border), interacted with RNAPII (small green spheres under name), interacted with CSB (red spheres), or became ubiquitylated upon UV irradiation (yellow “dUb”) are indicated. Examples of CSB or RNAPII interactions that increased (black circle around spheres) or decreased (yellow circle around spheres) upon UV irradiation are also specified. (B) As in (A), but for proteins that interact with SRPK1.pTEFb in a protein phosphatase (PP2B/PPP3CA and PP1a/ PPP1CA)-dependent manner (Chen et al., 2008). Interestingly, PPP1CA scored in the siRNA screen, and both PPP1CA and its regulatory subunit PPP1R10 interacted with RNAPII and CSB. Indeed, PPP1R10 was markedly recruited to CSB upon UV irradiation, like CDK9. PPP1R10 contains a domain, TFIIS-N, which is also found in transcription proteins such as MED26, Elongin A, IWS1, and TFIIS, raising the intriguing possibility that this domain is important for PPP1R10’s proposed role in transcription and in the transcription-related DNA damage response in particular. Together, these results place PTEFb (CDK9 and its cyclin partners) at the core of the transcriptionrelated DNA damage response. Several well-known DNA-damage kinases were associated with a large number of increasingly phosphorylated proteins. For example, ATM kinase has.